Re: Space Policy Sucks, while there's Life on Venus

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/23/05 

Date: 23 Feb 2005 08:02:29 -0800

WARNING; this reply (wall of words) uses the 'G' and 'H' names along
with the likes of our resident warlord 'GW Bush' and of a certain Pope
that sucks. Actually my list of qualified individuals that suck is far
too extensive as to incorporate within this effort.

In spite of what others are having to say, I believe that I've been
delivering sufficient research and information much like the 'New York
Times' newspaper that you most likely accept as being reasonably
moderated into accommodating the truth and hopefully nothing but the
truth. However, the NYT is certainly owned and operated by humans that
do indeed have ulterior motives and hidden agendas. Fortunately,
neither the NYT nor fot that matter of whatever I'm attempting to
provide is required reading.

Often an ulterior motive and/or hidden agenda is perfectly wholesome
and otherwise well intended (most readers do not want to know the
punch-line or story-ending up front, whereas most scientist only what
the ending, as they could care less of whatever it took getting to that
summation). However, from time to time not all is going to be of what's
perceived by the naked eye, not even via the all-knowing
physics/science eye, much less by the subjective interpretations of
those of us having to read through whatever's becoming more and more
often another government sponsored infomercial published tpoic as
though it were a well thought-out and thereby reasonably considerate
article that actually may not have been the whole truth as it should be
told, such as via evidence exclusions might accomplish far more good
than the mere facts as prsented to the beholding eye that'll simply
have to manage without.

Actually of whatever's mainstream is government, and vise versa,
whereas whatever's just outside the box or even flowing along with the
outflow of religion and politics isn't necessarily all bad and evil, as
those are the individuals and collectives (usually having to hide
behind phony baloney names and of avoiding any other traceable ID) of
folks responsible for typically backing each and every step and
consequence of whatever effectively suits their government and/or
religion to a bloody tee if need be, as these individuals having
suggested that all has been good and as it should be (apparently that
includes the likes of 9/11 and of those perpetrated wars). Of course,
I'm the village idiot that's been taking exceptions to all of that
because it's getting in the way of whatever our moon is good for and of
banishing other life upon Venus...

Fortunately, the entire context of the NYT isn't required reading, and
thereby we may pick and chose whatever's entertaining and/or informing
us, which generally is worth far less than 10% of whatever's published,
and simply isn't having anything to do with notions of allowing
topic/author stalking and bashings for sport, at least not nearly as
interactively as per whatever's getting published within the internet
version of a public free-for-all newspaper, as per whatever's of news
and various specific topics as public dog-fight forums that have their
built-in gauntlet of mainstream status quo flak to contend with.

Actually the public audience of a given forum isn't all that great as
you'd think, at least by the forums that I've encountered are mostly
chuck full of their own official and unofficial moderators that are
cocked and loaded for bear, with little if any honest intentions of
their contributing squat, much less for allowing others to contribute
anything that's outside of the mainstream status quo box. Thus I'm
suspecting that fewer than 1% of whatever's being contributed is
honestly of free will and with good intentions. Since these few honest
individuals seldom post a tenth as much as the other 99%, that seems to
represent that perhaps 99.9% of whatever's within any given forum is
utter crapolla, as in personal promotions, vendettas and/or
orchestrated infomercials of disinformation on steroids, plus ulterior
motives and hidden agendas to boot, which leaves us with the remainder
of 0.1% of the internet forums that otherwise suck as being worthwhile.
Thus exactly like the NYT, you'll need to pick and chose rather
carefully.

There are somewhat powerful individuals encharge of and/or influencing
these warm and fuzzy internet forums, of many insider individuals that
are sort of self proclaimed as all-knowing moderators of whatever is
being shared upon THEIR internet, whereas such forums that summarily
suck are strictly their turf, and of whatever opponent and topic
bashing is their game. It's no freaking wonder that schools and
serious publications can't hardly extract squat without their having to
sift through the other 99.9% of absolute crapolla.

Thus we have individuals attempting to represent the very soul of
humanity that'll propose and say one thing while generally bashing all
others at the same time. Even the Paradoxicitis forum
http://paradoxicitis.proboards27.com/index.cgi offers yet another good
'Skull and Bones' ruse example of suggesting itself as being anti-Bush
and pro-environment, while otherwise they'll stalk and bash whomever is
actually anti-Bush and pro-environment. Go figure?

When I've posted a topic of research and of viable ideas and/or of
merely positive notions on behalf of utilizing our moon, or that of
accomplishing interplanetary communications, I instantly obtain their
usual automatic bashing and nearly continual stalking by those intent
upon keeping others from taking anything too serious. That's too bad
since absolutely everything I've had to offer is the truth and nothing
but the truth, although since I'm human and thereby I'm not all-knowing
(haven't been properly assimilated into their all-knowing collective),
thus I've made more than my fair share of mistakes (usually
grammar/syntax and math related). Although, at least I'm always willing
to give the fullest of credits to whomever, as well as to returning any
favor with as much love and affection as I'm receiving.

On behalf of many perfectly honest topics posted into the BBC forum
that sucks all the way from across the pond
http://www.bbc.co.uk/messageboards/culturetopic.shtml is offering
another prime example of honest folks having to continually deal with
those claiming as being one thing (generally represented as all-knowing
and simply wizards about nearly everything that's history, astronomy,
physics and/or hard-science), but then consistently stalking and
bashing whomever is actually sharing absolutely anything that's rocking
their precious mainstream boat. Such as my good intentions of planting
purely robotic instruments upon our moon that are interactive in
responding to atmospheric energy(sounds) and unavoidably detecting
seismic considerations, and of a topic regarding Javelin Probes for
obtaining a 3D map of the lunar interior that'll provide much other
needed data upon the day/night environment and of efficiently
converting all of that information into the sort of signals that you
and I can see as numbers and/or just as easily hear as sounds. This is
where all hell broke lose and the BBC moderators that suck were
absolutely damned if anyone was going to suggest upon accomplishing any
form of instrumentation getting deployed anywhere upon the moon for
absolutely any reason whatsoever, much less of their sharing in the
required physics and hard-science that would be required, and God
forbid affording something that's openly interactive to the scientific
community (meaning without NASA/Apollo moderation) simply wasn't going
to happen (period!).

Thus the NASA/Apollo incest cloning process of creating such absolute
borgs is effectively accomplished and, lo and behold the typically
dumbfounded British public is none the wiser, every bit as snookered as
can be and perfectly happy as to jump off the edge of their flat Earth
in order to prove it. Brother, talk about your mad-cow infected
intellectual pigs that badly need to goto the nearest slaughterhouse.

Of course, I've tried multiple times at offering numerous other
perfectly subjective though I believe doable interpretations on the
topics of applied technology, of other life upon Venus, of what's
otherwise possible as to obtain for the maximum benefit of humanity,
such as for getting the LSE-CM/ISS up and running, as to the long-term
(105,000 year) environment relationship to the Sirius star system and
so forth, whereas lo and behold it has been their continual flak filled
gauntlet of being systematically stalked and bashed at every turn.
Fortunately for ethnic intellectual cleansing of the BBC forums that
suck, unlike the extended archiving capability of most forums, it seems
the BBC archiving process involves an automatic purge of whatever's
least or inactive, thus all systematically returns itself to the
original mainstream status quo regardless of the truth. I believe if
the likes of Hitler and of certain Popes that were exterminating
Cathars for sport were still active, if they had such an advantage of
an auto-purging instead of the inefficiencies and polluting
alternatives of systematic though somewhat indiscriminate pillagings
and book-burnings, whereas this BBC internet version would have been
the ideal solution as to insuring that their public would soon forget
about all of the collateral damage and carnage of the innocent.

I actually have several related papers external to these forums that
suck, that'll eventually have to get edited and republished since they
focus upon this form of intellectual incest that's been responsible for
moderating the truth and nothing but the truth to death. Whereas you'd
think that the likes of raw physics and science should not have become
such a social/political football, unfortunately it has, actually has
always been, and the final outcome will most likely remain at the mercy
of whomever's the residing commander and chief warlord.

It's unfortunate that our educational institutions have become so
moderated, and thereby focused upon supporting liars and the bloody
lies they represent, as it's an all-American sort of method or ruse of
keeping the troops as dumb and dumber, thereby easily snookered and
thoroughly dumbfounded at every turn, which is exactly how the likes of
Hitler and certain Popes wouldn't have had it any other way.

Perhaps now that the public is being allowed as to consider upon
intelligent design as a somewhat better probability than of the
traditional evolution via panspermia and/or of Godly creationism (I
actually consider creationism as being that of ET intelligent design
accomplishing a little friendly terraforming, at least that's exactly
what a good number of Earthly ETs have planned for Mars), as such
there's a slim chance that folks will eventually look a wee bit outside
the box, possibly even think about leaving the mainstream boat before
it sinks within the intellectual cesspool outflow that as been never
ending since recorded time. Unfortunately, politics and religion (often
these are one and the same) have cultivated their individual flocks of
village idiot morons as to becoming so pathetically confused and
snookered that it'll be difficult if not impossible to get the truth
and nothing but the truth out, at least as long as hell hasn't frozen
over or them Apollo cows haven't come home, as few if anyone in their
snookered mind is going to allow folks to accept that we've never been
alone, and that our God(s) have been quite mortal ETs with notions of
intelligent design at their disposal.

Of course, this further represents that my God(s) as superior ETs that
are not only capable of kicking your God's ***, but at least mine are
not the least bit limited to the failed designs of humanity and of
numerous other creatures of this Earth, thus mine are not even limited
as to our solar system. In fact, it seems that my Godly ETs probably
had something to do with the Sirius star system that we've cruised our
solar system past every 105,000 or so years. Of course, sharing my
silly notions of folks employing energy efficient and even technology
efficient methods of what best accommodates the widest possible species
as an acceptable format of interplanetary and even interstellar
communications via visible laser cannon is yet another taboo or
'nondisclosure' or bust situation for these forums that suck. Topics of
such communication efforts are continually stalked and bashed at every
possible opportunity (obtaining the usual zero worth of positive
contributions), and/or otherwise having to deal with working around
evidence exclusions, as mainstream applied when and wherever necessary
so as to further impede and/or destroy any honorable intentions from
ever seeing the light of day.

Thus lo and behold, the life and times of forums that suck goes on and
on, as the likes of the NYT and numerous other spendy publications
keeps right on publishing those government sponsored infomercials as
though they were legitimate articles of the truth and nothing but the
truth, even though there's been no hard science that hasn't been based
almost entirely upon conditional physics and of undocumented science
about our moon, and now those same tactics have been applied against
everything that's Venus, yet the forums that suck see nothing improper
in continuing their course of the blind following the blind headed
after those same thousand points of light (I'll assume those lights are
the oil lamps of Iraq), along with the NYT that still publishes
whatever's mainstream as to pay all those spendy royalties, rents and
in order to continue their spendy lives without remorse. Again, the
likes of Hitler and of much worse individuals simply wouldn't have had
it any other way. Of course, given time and our resident warlord could
perpetrate upon any number of WMD lies in order to get WW-III underway,
as then we wont have to worry about our moon or that of Venus.

I haven't forgotten NASA's very own uplink.space.com as one of the
untimate forums that sucks, either that or it's the ultimate
intellectual space-toilet of disinformation-R-us. I'll just assume that
as dumb and dumber and thereby as snookered as you most likely are,
that no one can possibly be so absolutely dumbfounded as to think
otherwise. As even a certified village idiot heathen moron would have
to realize as to what the likes of our NASA has at stake as to hiding
the perpetrated cold-war truth until them Apollo cows come home, as
being one of those all or nothing go-for-broke situations of busting
everything in sight trying to sustain their grand ruse of the century.

Regards, Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

Quantcast