Re: An oasis on the moon?
From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: Space Tourist Spacesuits"
- Previous message: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- In reply to: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Next in thread: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Reply: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:37:20 GMT
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:23:38 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
greg@see-web-page.edu (Greg Kuperberg) made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>>But, love him or hate him, the VSE is a sensible plan that moves us in
>>the right direction.
>
>I agree with you completely that overall political loyalties are a
>complete distraction from the VSE. Labelling everyone who opposes
>the VSE a "Bush hater" is sophomoric.
It is. Do you have anyone in mind? I surely haven't done that.
>As O'Keefe plainly states it, testing new technology is reason #1 to
>return to the moon; evidence of ice is reason #2. Reason #1 is catch-all
>promotion for everything that NASA does. Reason #2 is wishful thinking.
That's your (uninformed) opinion, not a fact.
- Next message: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: Space Tourist Spacesuits"
- Previous message: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- In reply to: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Next in thread: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Reply: Greg Kuperberg: "Re: An oasis on the moon?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|