Re: NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts ...
From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Poison, From the Far Right? (Rocket Fuel...)"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Will McLean: "Re: NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts ..."
- Next in thread: George William Herbert: "Re: NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:11:31 GMT
On 1 Mar 2005 07:05:33 -0800, in a place far, far away, "Will McLean"
<mclean1382@aol.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
>While some earlier versions of the Shuttle-C had the constraint you
>mentioned, the variant they had in mind for Option C had a shroud that
>was big enough to take a seven meter diameter module. That seems plenty
>big enough for a respectable module.
It's better, but still not getting the maximum utility out of the
investment in a heavy lifter that a twenty-seven footer would provide.
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Poison, From the Far Right? (Rocket Fuel...)"
- Previous message: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Will McLean: "Re: NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts ..."
- Next in thread: George William Herbert: "Re: NASA rushes plan to send humans to moon, Mars, despite doubts ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]