Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?
From: Rand Simberg (simberg.interglobal_at_org.trash)
Date: 03/05/05
- Next message: Allen Thomson: "Re: Gravity Creation Idea (don't assume troll)"
- Previous message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- In reply to: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- Next in thread: Jorge R. Frank: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:52:30 GMT
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 14:43:27 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Paul F.
Dietz" <dietz@dls.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
>Fred J. McCall wrote:
>
>> In any relatively 'low production rate' system that third '9' is
>> usually a pig to get....
>
>And now they're saying half the risk in any shuttle flight is from
>orbital debris strikes. Experience isn't going to solve that one.
>That all by itself may make airline-type reliability for reusable
>launchers impossible.
Yes, but it's not necessary to achieve that level, and there's such a
huge current gap between the two that there's plenty of room for
improvement.
- Next message: Allen Thomson: "Re: Gravity Creation Idea (don't assume troll)"
- Previous message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- In reply to: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- Next in thread: Jorge R. Frank: "Re: Japans Moon Ambitions - They're KIDDING, Right ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
