Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Ian St. John (istjohn_at_noemail.usa)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:08:17 -0500
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <iffm21131p62kj7paa1vplv0ncjs93uvav@4ax.com>,
> Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> "Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Rand Simberg wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:53:41 -0500, in a place far, far away, "Ian
>>>> St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> made the phosphor on my monitor
>>>> glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> And you think that is the same as the claim "Iraq and Nuclear,
>>>>>> Biological and Chemical WMD"?
>>>>>
>>>>> The claim was that Iraq had WMDs fitting the bill as 'nuclear,
>>>>> biological and chemical'. Are you trying to sound like an idiot or
>>>>> is it natural?
>>>>
>>>> Any one of those things constitute WMD. *All* three are not
>>>> required to meet the definition. Is your understanding of basic
>>>> logic so bereft as to not be able to distinguish between "AND" and
>>>> "OR"?
>>>
>>> It does not matter whether the false claims of stockpiles and
>>> programs for :'WMDs' consist of ALL of the possible types or ANY of
>>> the possible types. There were no stockpiles or capabilities for
>>> ANY of the types that are classified as WMDs.
>>
>> But pretty much every national intelligence organization in the world
>> believed there were ongoing chemical programs, including France and
>> Russia. Hell, his own generals believed they had chemical weapons!
>
> But our own CIA included plenty of caveats. And only Bush went to
> war over his beliefs.
I am not so sure that he even believed it. He is a fake from the getgo,
notably failing to admit that he smoked pot because he wanted to create an
image of himself without flaw to run for President. He also wanted an image
of himself as a 'war hero' so he pretty much faked the pretext and probably
knew exactly what he was doing.
>
>>
>>> Your desperate search for a nitpicking literary quibble pretty much
>>> puts paid to your claims.
>>
>> I see. YOUR inability to read "puts paid" to HIS claims.
>>
>> That's really quite funny. It would be funnier if I wasn't sure that
>> you devoutly believe it.
- Next message: Paul F. Dietz: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Rand Simberg: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
