Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Fred J. McCall (fmccall_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 04:50:21 GMT
"Ian St. John" <istjohn@noemail.usa> wrote:
:Lloyd Parker wrote:
:> In article <1lfm21tklofdvffunqviivq6qa2agktvri@4ax.com>,
:> Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote:
:>> lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
:>>
:>>> In article <2qfa21p0n857dqfk1lb3g17vqb11o4nalq@4ax.com>,
:>>> Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote:
:>>>> lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:
:>>>>
:>>>>> In article <42416fc7.999432908@newsgroups.bellsouth.net>,
:>>>>> simberg.interglobal@org.trash (Rand Simberg) wrote:
:>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:11:37 -0500, in a place far, far away,
:>>>>>> "Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> made the phosphor on my
:>>>>>> monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
:>>>>>>
:>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>> "Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote in message
:>>>>>>> news:424068e1.997667530@newsgroups.bellsouth.net...
:>>>>>>>> He has made neither of those claims (unless by "about to be"
:>>>>>>>> you mean many years from now).
:>>>>>>>
:>>>>>>> "We found WMD. We found em." - George Bush (congenital liar.)
:>>>>>>
:>>>>>> I think you're the congenital liar here. WMD doesn't have to
:>>>>>> include nuclear weapons. One can "find WMD" by finding simply
:>>>>>> chemical weapons.
:>>>>>
:>>>>> Which we've not done either.
:>>>>
:>>>> Except, of course, that we have.
:>>>
:>>> You are lying.
:>>
:>> Wrong.
:>>
:>>> We have found none.
:>>
:>> Wrong again.
:>
:> Then tell us what we've found.
:
:They did. In the final report. Nothing.
You should read something before you start making claims about what is
in it.
>From the report you claim says nothing was found:
"...a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered...."
You're lying when you claim the report says nothing was found.
:>>> Of course, since 2/3 of Republicans
:>>> believe we have, your delusion is quite normal for you.
:>>
:>> This says that 2/3 of Republicans can actually read, which apparently
:>> puts them well ahead of you.
:>>
:>>>> What we haven't done is found them in large quantities.
:>>>
:>>> Or small, or medium.
:>>
:>> I'd say you're merely ignorant, but given your vehemence I think it's
:>> out and out lying.
:>>
:>> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html
:>>
:>> http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2004-01/11/content_297802.htm
:>>
:>> http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3448.html
:>>
:>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24403-2004Jul2.html
:>>
:>> http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/12/05/40413.html
:>>
:>> How many would you like?
:>>
:>> Liar, Ian. You're merely a liar.
:>>
:>
:> None of which say we've found WMD since we haven't. (OK, maybe Faux
:> News would say that.)
:
:Main point is that even the U.S. final report admits that their were no
:stockpiles or capabilities, only a risk of 'someday' which is meaningless as
:anyone might do something someday. It was not the necessary 'smoking gun'
:that would justify a 'retaliatory strike' but merely a selective
:interpretation of badly flawed intelligence selected to support a private
:war.
Again, you should read things before making claims as to what they
say. From the same report:
"A former nerve agent expert indicated that Iraq retained the
capability to produce nerve agent in significant quantities within two
years, given the import of required phosphorous precursors."
You're lying again....
--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates
- Next message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Fred J. McCall: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- In reply to: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Reply: Ian St. John: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
