Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!
From: Mark Cook (mcook_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 03/18/05
- Next message: Mark Cook: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Cray74_at_gmail.com: "Re: Limits to telescope size"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Mark Cook: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:27:13 GMT
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
news:d1fclt$gec$6@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <O9o_d.44$45.10969@news.uchicago.edu>,
> mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:
> >In article <Lwj_d.6358$ZB6.625@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>, "Mark Cook"
> <mcook@prodigy.net> writes:
> >>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
> >>news:d1c9tm$eqh$14@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >>> In article <cL3_d.21527$hU7.12421@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>,
> >>> "Mark Cook" <mcook@prodigy.net> wrote:
> >>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> I see you've chosen to not comment upon the reference in FL law I
> posted
> >>> stating that absentee ballots must be signed.
> >>
> >>Lloyd, I did comment, I noted that you were trying to use 2004 codes on
a
> >>2000 election. I thought that you would have submitted a 2000 code, but
> >>since you are so insistent that I comment further, I will.
> >>
> >>Did you think that I would not check on your citation??? Did you really
> >>think that you could pull this off?? There is NO Fla. Stat. 101.661 (7)
> >>(2004). You MADE IT UP!!!!!!!!!
> >>
> >>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@emory.edu> wrote......
> >>
> >>"7. VERY IMPORTANT. In order for your absentee ballot to be counted,
you
> >>must sign your name on the line above (Voter's Signature). "
> >>
> >>Florida code 101.661
> >>
>
>>(http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&U
> RL
> >>=Ch0101/ch0101.htm)
> >>
> >>Now, can it be any clearer?
> >>
>
>>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/a0f0dc9edf70db0c?
> dmo
> >>de=source
> >>
> >>If you go to your link, it shows us the Chapter 101 of the Florida 2004
> >>Election Code. Why do you think that 2004 Election Code applies to the
> 2000
> >>Election is beyond me. IF you believe that this is true, CLEARLY you
have
> NO
> >>CLUE to how the US Legal System works. But I digress, I notice that you
> did
> >>not give a link to take us to the exact code that you were citing.
> >>
> >>Why didn't you want us to see this code??? It is because YOU MADE IT
> UP!!!!!
> >>
> >>Let's look at your code that you cited:
> >>
> >> 101.661 Voting absentee ballots.--All electors must personally mark or
> >>designate their choices on the absentee ballot, except:
> >>(1) Electors who require assistance to vote because of blindness,
> >>disability, or inability to read or write, who may have some person of
> the
> >>elector's choice, other than the elector's employer, an agent of the
> >>employer, or an officer or agent of the elector's union, mark the
> elector's
> >>choices or assist the elector in marking his or her choices on the
> ballot.
> >>
> >>(2) As otherwise provided in s. 101.051 or s. 101.655.
> >>
>
>>http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMen
> u=1
> >>&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=CH0101/Sec661.HTM
> >>
> >>There is NO NUMBER 7 to this code!!!!
> >>
> >>> Guess that tells me how adult you are.
> >>
> >>Why do you have to make up facts, Lloyd??? Is that what passes for an
> adult
> >>in your book????
> >>
> >Hmm, interesting, really interesting. I used to judge Lloyd by the
> >rule of "do not attribute to malice what can be explained by mere
> >stupidity". But this, here, goes way beyond "mere stupidity".
> >
> >Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
> >meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
> Are you aware what Mark's been arguing? That a ballot must either be
> postmarked or signed and dated to count as cast on time means if a ballot
> is postmarked it does not have to be signed. FL law is clear:
>
> "6. VERY IMPORTANT. In order for your absentee ballot to be counted, you
> must sign your name on the line above (Voter's Signature), place the last
> four digits of your Social Security number in the space provided, and your
> ballot must be witnessed in either of the following manners: "
>
> (FL law 101.65)
What Lloyd conveniently ignores is that FAC 1S-2.013(7) is the controlling
code in the matter.
Further,he has NOT explained why the Florida Attorney General opinion is
incorrect. His response is get an English teacher to explain the law to you.
"This office believes that Florida and federal law support the counting of
overseas military ballots from qualified electors registered to vote in the
county if one of the following two conditions is met:"
"The ballot is postmarked no later than the date of the election, or the
ballot is signed and dated no later than the date of the election.(2)"
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/News/20001128-1.html
- Next message: Mark Cook: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Previous message: Cray74_at_gmail.com: "Re: Limits to telescope size"
- Maybe in reply to: Klaus Heitman: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Next in thread: Mark Cook: "Re: Runaway Global Warming Possible!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
