Re: Is NASA brain dead?

From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/24/05 

Date: 23 Mar 2005 23:01:04 -0800

If you're accepting that there was life upon Mars, in that case there's
even larger and more robust life (possibly still surviving) to be found
upon Venus.
Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm

extrasense,
LIFE on MARS http://mywebpages.comcast.net/­extrasense

Unlike some that would automatically discredit whatever wasn't their
idea or topic focus, I personally have no problem with supporting the
'once upon a time' notions that Mars accommodated significant other
life. In fact, I'd have to suggest that due to our solar system being
in an extended orbit with the likes of the massive Sirius star system,
that roughly every 105,000 some odd years is where there could have
been a good 20,000 and some odd years worth of a window, of being much
warmer and certainly of more illuminated times for whatever life to
have been sustained upon Mars.

However, as of this moment it is not looking all that great unless
we're talking about ETs having been imported to Mars along with some
degree of applied technology, and then once Mars was significantly
pulverised and of their climate having became too cold is when they
were extracted (possibly transferred to Earth, even though Venus might
have offered an even better choice).

Life today upon Mars is pretty much without O2, it has become downright
TBI as well as just plain old cold and nasty. At less than 1% the
atmosphere of Earth, and of mostly CO2 at that, although life would
have remained as possible underground where it would still have
required some degree of detectable thermal signature, there has been no
detection of anything sufficiently thermal as to indicate they ever
managed to survive.

In order to sustain surface life upon Mars as we'd know it, this task
would have given off a sufficient thermal and/or chemical signature
detectable from Earth. Thus far there's been nothing close to
resembling an artificial source of essential energy nor life related
chemicals as would need to be concentrated near whatever life, which
doesn't represent that life hadn't once managed when there were energy
resources available. The option of cold-blooded life isn't going to
offer much of anything that's not of a microbe based form of life,
whereas Venus has loads of spare energy, as in absolutely lots more
than Earth and, it would only have required the most basic of
physics-101 and simple minded folks if not village idiots that would
have been capable of surviving the environment of Venus, and especially
as within the nighttime season of Venus.

So, if you even so much as think there was life once upon a time on
Mars, much less of something still surviving Mars, as then for a matter
of fact Life upon Venus is a done deal as of right here and now, and
it's because of the laws of physics that'll prove that statement
without even having another look-see at what a certain 8-bit and 12
look/pixel image has been showing us that's most likely artificial
about Venus, meaning there was and may still be significant other life
surviving upon Venus. To so much as argue otherwise is an absolute
death sentence for the likes of Mars, and I for one do believe Mars
once supported significant other life that simply got the short end of
the stick when it came down to their planet surviving the position it
was given, and with the lack of geological resources as to deal with
avoiding the eventual demise of Mars as becoming what we see of it
today.

Basically Mars is badly in need of an infusion of energy, and lots of
it, as from within or otherwise from another star like Sirius is about
the only hope for re-utilizing the Mars surface for the likes of
humanity. Of course, just getting folks there is damn spendy and even
more risky than orbiting our moon, much less having to land on our
moon, as going for Mars is pretty much a one-way ticket that you might
not even survive the trip getting yourself to the likes of Mars.

Nothing is impossible but, Mars is certainly about as close to being
insurmountable as human goals tend to get, and certainly off the
affordable charts as to what talents and resources are available for
making even a one-way ticket possible. Whereas Venus is frequently
within 105 times the distance to our moon, and there's already more
easily available energy and usable elements than you can shake a
flaming stick at, and of so much energy that damn little if any extra
energy needs to be sent along for the ride in order to support Venus
missions, which thereby can be offered as round trip tickets.

The fact that it's entirely possible for humans to effectively reach
the surface of Venus and survive within suitable technology, the only
problem is that we should not go to Venus, at least not in person. And,
I'd have to say the same as for Mars, except just getting folks to Mars
isn't going to be cheap nor all that safe, and that's even if it's a
one-way ticket.

-

This closing rant is contributed for the ongoing benefit of others
(news media and general topic newcomers), and not that any of this
topic matters to those without a stitch of remorse outside of whatever
appeases their pagan NASA/Apollo cold-war or bust God(s), as in spite
of their spermware flak having the intent as to kill-off my PC if not
myself, within my spare dyslexic time I've slightly polished on my
external 'gv-topics.htm' page, and I'm remaining intent upon working on
other pages as soon to be improved. As I learn more that can be
independently supported by sufficient hard-science and subjectively
honest interpretations of whatever I have to work with, as best I'll
share that knowledge, which will likely include revisions and
retractions upon any number of what I've offered thus far.
Unfortunately, since I'm unfunded and on the usual 'need-to-know' bases
with regard to anything that might rock a mainstream boat, and that my
PC is being continually attacked with NSA/MI6 spermware, it seems this
process is going to take many thousands of my lose cannon shots before
the truth and nothing but the truth is ever going be told. And I bet
you thought the likes of big and fully loaded aircraft smashing into
fully occupied tall buildings was as bad as it gets; think again.

Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator):
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable
    ... capable of surviving Venus, at least at full capacity while operating ... Technically even life as we know it, as dumb and dumber and thereby as ... and of a reverse-kiln that's got access to unlimited energy ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: life outside the earth isnt Mars, though try Venus
    ... actually quite anti-ET and thus anti-God. ... I believe that Venus is no longer a certified greenhouse ... advanced) life upon Mars, thus once upon a time having such other life ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Life on Venus is absolute hell, but doable
    ... The problem is: what's life. ... You are talking about possibility to survive of Earth forms on Venus. ... Main probe has several probes to jump on Fobos. ... > capable of surviving Venus, at least at full capacity while operating ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Radiative Habitable Zones in Martian Polar Environments
    ... Mars polar habitat zone that's covered by such a thick crystal ... solid ice" as having provided us with this following research link ... their being other such life within ice; ... Of course, going for Venus is almost too easy, especially when at times ...
    (sci.astro.seti)
  • Re: Venus Express sees down to the Hell-hot surface
    ... nearly insurmountable task of having to terraform Venus, ... life in more viable ways than it's being given credit for. ... Venus remains as the most nearby and absolute most ... Unlike our nearly frozen solid to the very core of that silly old Mars, ...
    (sci.space.history)