Re: NASA Issues new Safety Guidelines
From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: 03/25/05
- Next message: Neil Halelamien: "Re: A New Way to Explore the Moon"
- Previous message: Ed Kyle: "Re: Dnepr to Orbit NASA Probes?"
- In reply to: Jorge R. Frank: "Re: NASA Issues new Safety Guidelines"
- Next in thread: Craig Fink: "Re: NASA Issues new Safety Guidelines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 06:41:10 GMT
In article <Xns9623B9D607000jrfrank@216.196.97.131>,
Jorge R. Frank <jrfrank@ibm-pc.borg> wrote:
>...The USAF provides range safety for
>the entire Eastern Test Range - both KSC and CCAFS. That gives them both a
>voice in, and veto over, NASA launch decisions. In practice, they've
>rubber-stamped NASA in the past, but they've publicly given subtle hints
>that they aren't willing to do that any more...
It would be interesting to know the internal politics behind this one.
Almost certainly there is more here than meets the eye. There are a lot
of judgement calls in the safety rules, and a *lot* of politics in which
ones get enforced to the letter and which ones don't, either by formal
waiver or just by being quietly disregarded.
I'm told that to launch a Titan IVB in strict conformance with all Cape
safety rules, you would have to evacuate most of Florida first. And you
could not launch a Titan IVA, 34D, or IIIC/D/E at all.
--
"Think outside the box -- the box isn't our friend." | Henry Spencer
-- George Herbert | henry@spsystems.net
- Next message: Neil Halelamien: "Re: A New Way to Explore the Moon"
- Previous message: Ed Kyle: "Re: Dnepr to Orbit NASA Probes?"
- In reply to: Jorge R. Frank: "Re: NASA Issues new Safety Guidelines"
- Next in thread: Craig Fink: "Re: NASA Issues new Safety Guidelines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|