Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Sander Vesik <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:05:01 +0000 (UTC)
Mike Combs <mikecombs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Mr.XyZ" <forex50@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:WQmje.19418$ye1.152@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > If we ever decide to resume lunar exploration (even if it is robotic at
> > first) is there any chance that propulsion or fuel systems have improved
> > enough where we could get there in 1 day instead of 3?
>
> Gee, what's the rush?
Who wants to sit in a silly tin can if they can instead be on moon?
space really sucks as a landscape ;-)
>
> This reminds me of the second episode of Futurama. Frye is told that
> they're going to the moon. He's tremendously excited, and asks if he can
> recite the countdown:
>
> Frye: 10.... 9.... 8.... 7....
>
> Leela: We're there.
>
> Frye: 654321!
>
well, 1g transport to moon would be nice ;-) And would take a comfortable
3.5 hours. Getting there (much) faster gets rather tedious fast:
~ 2.5 hours at 2g
~ 2 hours at 3g
~ 1h40 at 4g
~ 1h30 at 5g
~ 55 minutes at 14g
The two ways of looking at this are:
* humans will most probably never make it to the moon faster
than in an hour
* it might be fesible to daily commute to work (and back)
from your apartment on Moon at some point in the future.
--
Sander
+++ Out of cheese error +++
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- References:
- Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Mr.XyZ
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Mike Combs
- Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Prev by Date: Re: New centennial challenge: regolith O2 extractor
- Next by Date: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Previous by thread: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Next by thread: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|