Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 23:49:15 GMT
"Sander Vesik" <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1116626701.536933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> well, 1g transport to moon would be nice ;-) And would take a comfortable
> 3.5 hours. Getting there (much) faster gets rather tedious fast:
> ~ 2.5 hours at 2g
> ~ 2 hours at 3g
> ~ 1h40 at 4g
> ~ 1h30 at 5g
> ~ 55 minutes at 14g
>
> The two ways of looking at this are:
> * humans will most probably never make it to the moon faster
> than in an hour
Well, until a transporter is developed! :-)
(speaking of which, anyone read Penrose's theory of why electrons and
photons can "be in two places at once" but macroscopic objects can't be?)
> * it might be fesible to daily commute to work (and back)
> from your apartment on Moon at some point in the future.
>
> --
> Sander
>
> +++ Out of cheese error +++
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Earl Colby Pottinger
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- References:
- Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Mr.XyZ
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Mike Combs
- Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- From: Sander Vesik
- Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Prev by Date: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Next by Date: Re: Mars v. Asteroids
- Previous by thread: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Next by thread: Re: Time it takes for Lunar Travel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|