Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Damon Hill <damonunoseisuno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:27:04 -0500
gherbert@xxxxxxxxx (George William Herbert) wrote in
news:1194nc8a0uvfoc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> Either BoeMart's EELVs cost too much, in which case there is market
> opportunity for vendors to undercut, or they don't cost too much,
> in which case the government is not paying too much to use them.
I sort of like Boelock as a contraction; sounds like bollock...
which may kind of sum up the situation.
SpaceX may have a ways to go to demonstrate that they can
build a large enough vehicle that would be capable of undercutting
anyone. I'm hoping they can put some heat on the Consortium
to keep them semi-honest. I don't see any other American
company that could challenge them, and I doubt we'd contract
outside the USA for that kind of launch service.
--Damon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- References:
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: George William Herbert
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Prev by Date: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Next by Date: Re: Is the USA turning into an Evil Empire?
- Previous by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Next by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Index(es):