Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 10:26:00 -0500
Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
No they're not. This is the same logic that Feynman slams when the
engineers saw 2/3rds of O-rings burned through and still claimed it "had a
safety margin" when in reality the O-ring was never supposed to even burn at
all. So there was in reality no margin left.
Of course in this case we are talking about a motor for use on an unmanned vehicle. The SRB is a whole other ball of wax, and expected to have a far higher level of reliability, even if that means overbuilding it to gain reliability at the expense of performance.
Pat .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- References:
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Prev by Date: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Next by Date: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Previous by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Next by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Index(es):