Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: fairwater@xxxxxxxxx (Derek Lyons)
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 21:57:28 GMT
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I still like the fact that it's something we have had a lot of
>operational experience with over a couple of decades time.
The SRB, yes. An SRB derived launcher? No. There will be too many
differences between the systems to make a valid leap of faith, I mean
assumption, about the amount of experience and it's relationship.
D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.
-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL
.
- References:
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- From: Pat Flannery
- GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Prev by Date: Re: SpaceX Falcon I Hold-Down Firing Scheduled
- Next by Date: Re: More detailed info on SRB-J2S CEV launcher.
- Previous by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Next by thread: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
- Index(es):