Re: After the shuttle

From: "Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:23:21 -0500

WvB <wvb@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns9662CD72CAE36SpaceIDToken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> Herm <hermperez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:odi891d26mmtl0o4001ui20fhpifckksik@xxxxxxx:
>
>> well, I guess the standing army is safe for a few more decades..
>>
>> On 24 May 2005 18:52:52 -0700, "Steve Dufour"
>> <hobbitfan111@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"What we'll be retiring are the orbiters," Griffin said, referring to
>>>the winged, reusable crew/cargo components of the shuttle
>>>transportation system.
>
> To be fair, the standing army is mostly required for the ORBITER.

Really? What's the detailed breakdown?

--
JRF

Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.

References:
- Re: After the shuttle
  - From: Herm
- Re: After the shuttle
  - From: WvB

Prev by Date: Re: GRIFFIN'S DRIVE FOR SHUTTLE-DERIVED
Next by Date: Re: More detailed info on SRB-J2S CEV launcher.
Previous by thread: Re: After the shuttle
Next by thread: Re: After the shuttle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread