Re: After the shuttle
- From: Earl Colby Pottinger <earlcp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:08:22 -0500
"William Mook" <william.mook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
> Well, that may be true of the linear aerospike engine designed for the
> X-33. But I'm speaking of an older design that is pretty well proven;
>
> http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4221/p236.htm
To my knowledge NASA has never flown an aerospike engine on any craft so how
can you claim it is a proven design?
Earl Colby Pottinger
--
I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos,
SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to
the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: After the shuttle
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: After the shuttle
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: After the shuttle
- References:
- Re: After the shuttle
- From: William Mook
- Re: After the shuttle
- Prev by Date: Re: Terraforming Mars
- Next by Date: Re: research suggestions for GPS/Galileo engineering/policy article
- Previous by thread: Re: After the shuttle
- Next by thread: Re: After the shuttle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|