Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Christopher P. Winter <chrisw20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:31:13 GMT
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 07:14:30 -0500, "Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>Mark R. Whittington wrote:
>> Rand, no I'm not. The key paragraph to understanding Derb's view on
>> space exploration in general is this one:
>>
>> "The gross glutted wealth of the federal government; the venality and
>> stupidity of our representatives; the lobbying power of big
>> rent-seeking corporations; the romantic enthusiasms of millions of
>> citizens; these are the things that 14 astronauts died for. To abandon
>> all euphemism and pretense, they died for pork, for votes, for share
>> prices, and for thrills (immediate in their own case, vicarious in
>> ours)."
>> Venality? Stupidity? They died for pork? For thrills? I think the
>> term"evil" fits rather nicely.
>
>Mark, Mark, Mark...
>
>You claimed he was stating that "any sort of space exploration is
>[...] downright evil."
>
>But this paragraph is refering to a *specific* form of space
>exploration, the government-funded shuttle program. Other forms
>may lack many of these deplorable features.
>
Yes, but elsewhere in his article, Derbyshire puts it a lot more
generally.
Paragraph 2:
"There is no longer much pretense that shuttle flights
in particular, or manned space flight in general, has
any practical value."
I grant you that Derbyshire might /mean/ government-funded manned space
flight, but that's not what he says. And the bit in paragraph 9 about the
superiority of robots makes it clear that he's talking about results, not
about who funds the missions or how they are conducted.
In addition, the absurd statement about astatine shows him to be clueless
about technology on a very basic level.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- References:
- From the National Review Online...
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Mark R. Whittington
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Mark R. Whittington
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Mark R. Whittington
- Re: From the National Review Online...
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- From the National Review Online...
- Prev by Date: Re: Space Shuttle costs.
- Next by Date: Re: Space Shuttle costs.
- Previous by thread: Re: From the National Review Online...
- Next by thread: Re: From the National Review Online...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|