Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:04:05 GMT
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:04:03 GMT, in a place far, far away,
henry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry Spencer) made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>In article <1119721978.812425.261430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>Ed Kyle <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>...Not to mention that a new maneuvering
>>cargo-hauling stage will be needed for the SpaceX
>>rockets, a need that could easily double or triple
>>the "real" Falcon V per-tonne payload costs.
>
>Why does there have to be a new maneuvering delivery stage on every rocket
>launched? This is silly; the right way to handle this is to base a
>refuelable tug at the destination.
Exactly. But we didn't do it that way in Apollo, so it can't be
right...
.
- References:
- It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- From: Henry Spencer
- It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- Prev by Date: Re: Climate Suprise! (Was: Re: The Urge to Explore - Nuclear Power!)
- Next by Date: Re: US Space News to break what happend to DART spacecraft tomarrow
- Previous by thread: Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- Next by thread: Re: It's In-Line (Shuttle Derived)
- Index(es):