Re: First Falcon start delayed
- From: Damon Hill <damon16ONE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 18:07:28 -0500
"Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:MZqdnRAP2rj1hVrfRVn-vw@xxxxxxx:
> richard schumacher wrote:
>
>>>Why does Falcon I require air transport to an island?
>>
>>
>> How else would it get there?
>
> By ship?
This particular island is so small that it appears to not
have a landing strip long enough to support a large cargo
aircraft. There is at least one long pier, though.
Most likely the rocket >will< be flown to a nearby island
with a suitable landing facility and a pier, assembled on
its transporter, and barged to the launch island.
But I think they actually have to >build< the launch
pad first...
--Damon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- From: Tom Cuddihy
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- References:
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- From: Explorer
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- From: richard schumacher
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: First Falcon start delayed
- Prev by Date: Re: First Falcon start delayed
- Next by Date: Re: Griffin Wants Inline SDLV and 5 Segment SRB/CEV
- Previous by thread: Re: First Falcon start delayed
- Next by thread: Re: First Falcon start delayed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|