Re: DIY space transport
- From: Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:37:42 -0600
In article <EdKBe.49099$oJ.23420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Pete Lynn" <pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would still have to say that I do not think there is a current rocket
> engine within the right design range let alone a well developed one.
> This is not to say that current engines are not workable, just that no
> engine has really hit the spot yet. Specifically, a low cost, reliable,
> easy to use engine with high ISP and much higher T/W. While not
> necessary, such an engine would significantly ease the development of
> space transports. Such rocket engine metal bending is long overdue.
Is that not exactly what XCOR is doing?
Best,
- Joe
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| joe@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: DIY space transport
- References:
- DIY space transport
- From: Pete Lynn
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Len
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Pete Lynn
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Len
- Re: DIY space transport
- From: Pete Lynn
- DIY space transport
- Prev by Date: Re: Deep Impact Kicks Off Fourth of July with Deep Space Fireworks
- Next by Date: Re: DIY space transport
- Previous by thread: Re: DIY space transport
- Next by thread: Re: DIY space transport
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading