Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:48:09 -0500
William Mook wrote:
I like the idea of upgrading the ET volume so that it could flyback
after use. The first four elements could glide back on their own power
under most circumstances with a L/D of about 12 - and the two could be
recovered downrange snagged like the old discovery satellites - mid
flight - and towed back to the launch center for release
I still think this is about the slickest flyback booster unit I ever saw: http://www.buran.ru/htm/strbaik.htm I'm still trying to make heads or tails of this one: http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/wintitan.htm
Pat .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- References:
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: Michael Kent
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: William Mook
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: Tom Cuddihy
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- From: William Mook
- Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- Prev by Date: Re: DIY space transport
- Next by Date: Re: Thoughts on VSE Launch Vehicles
- Previous by thread: Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- Next by thread: Re: White Elephant (was Re: Naming 'the stick')
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading