Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- From: echomko_at_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric Chomko)
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC)
jonathan (write@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
: "Jon S. Berndt" <jsb.at.hal-pc-dot.org> wrote in message
: news:42e84f4d$0$550$a726171b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
: > > To see the shuttle broken again really hurts. Now it's a tragedy again.
: > > ...
: > > Ground the Shuttle forever!
: > >
: > > etc.
: >
: > Geez. I thought I'd test the waters and revisit s.s.s and s.s.p. Then to
: > see crap like this again ... The signal to noise ratio is still too low.
: >
: > We've got a camera on the ET, now, for only the second time in the program.
: > It's not that this hasn't been happening all along. Now we just know about
: > it. Sure, the insulation issue it needs to be addressed, but I don't see a
: > really long standdown due to this. I have a hunch that the orbiter belly is
: > cleaner (fewer divots) than in most previous flights based on what I've seen
: > so far. The ascent was very uneventful, in the words of Commander Collins,
: > as I recall reading.
: >
: > Get a grip.
: A reality check is the entire point. Let's see who has a grip.
: The entire point of the shuttle was to build a flippin space station
: as a foundation for greater goals. And now the prospect of having
: the ISS wear out before it's even finished is staring us in the face.
Wear out? In what way? Will it become obsolete due to the competition?
: Sorry for my English, but I can't emphasize the stark reality.
: THIRTY FLIPPIN YEARS of work down the tubes
: if the space station fails and we have to start over.
I bet you were one of the ones that didn't want to save Mir?
: We were supposed to have a reliable transportation system
: and a space station at the....same time. By the time we have
: a replacement shuttle the space station won't ...be there.
Where is it going?
: And by the time we build an ISS2, the shuttle2 will be
: worn out. Kind of a fundamental flaw in planning, as in
: it couldn't be any worse.
Makes you wonder about Bush's commitment to "moon, mars and beyond",
doesn't it?
: Flushed, a complete failure of Nasa's primary program stretching
: the better part of half a century.
: That's what history will say.
No it won't. It'll say that an aging fleet had troubles, and was
eventually replaced... Words like "failure" won't enter into the picture.
We still have three shuttles left, let's use them after we fix the fuel
tank problem.
Eric
: Jonathan
: s
: >
: > Jon
: >
: >
.
- References:
- Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- From: Jon S. Berndt
- Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- From: jonathan
- Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- Prev by Date: Re: Space travel hazzard
- Next by Date: Re: Around the Moon for $100M!
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- Next by thread: Re: Space Shuttle Grounded Indefinitely AGAIN Due To Major Flaw
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|