Re: Shuttle damage overkill

<mcdaniel_san2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123062703.043761.215380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. It would be silly
> for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the
> capability of accessing that portion of the shuttle which will provide
> useful info for future flights.
>
> -McDaniel

No reason why they shouldn't tack this task on the EVA, just wish they
wouldn't make such a big deal about it, as anything NASA says about possible
risk gets amplified a thousand-fold by the media.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... > The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... > for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: silly digital specs on analog parts
    ... model a fix) so I doubt I'll have time to try again. ... more than one reason. ... specs that you think apply and distribute this as a memo. ... The module spec is more than specs. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: silly digital specs on analog parts
    ... model a fix) so I doubt I'll have time to try again. ... specs that you think apply and distribute this as a memo. ... I'm used to working with pretty detailed specs, ... The module spec is more than specs. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: silly digital specs on analog parts
    ... model a fix) so I doubt I'll have time to try again. ... It makes me nervous fixing an offset problem by loading the node ... I'd agree but I can't even get a useful product spec. ... specs that you think apply and distribute this as a memo. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)