Re: Shuttle damage overkill



The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. It would be silly
for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the
capability of accessing that portion of the shuttle which will provide
useful info for future flights.

-McDaniel

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... > The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... > for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... risk gets amplified a thousand-fold by the media. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... > The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... > for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
    ... In the rep specs, we define ... The fix ... This fixes our problem. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
    ... In the rep specs, we define ... The fix ... This can be solved with the new Ada 2006 Stream_Size attribute. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: silly digital specs on analog parts
    ... model a fix) so I doubt I'll have time to try again. ... more than one reason. ... specs that you think apply and distribute this as a memo. ... The module spec is more than specs. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)