Re: Shuttle damage overkill



In article <1123062703.043761.215380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mcdaniel_san2@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. It would be silly
> for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the
> capability of accessing that portion of the shuttle which will provide
> useful info for future flights.

Let's just hope he doesn't put his foot through a tile.

--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O----------
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... > The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... > for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... risk gets amplified a thousand-fold by the media. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Shuttle damage overkill
    ... The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. ... for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
    ... In the rep specs, we define ... The fix ... This fixes our problem. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: Using GNAT.Sockets with Streams and Byte Swapping
    ... In the rep specs, we define ... The fix ... This can be solved with the new Ada 2006 Stream_Size attribute. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.ada)
  • Re: silly digital specs on analog parts
    ... model a fix) so I doubt I'll have time to try again. ... more than one reason. ... specs that you think apply and distribute this as a memo. ... The module spec is more than specs. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)