Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:41:35 +1200
In article <1123062703.043761.215380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mcdaniel_san2@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The gap filler is out more than is allowed by specs. It would be silly
> for them to ignore it when they can possibly fix it AND demonstrate the
> capability of accessing that portion of the shuttle which will provide
> useful info for future flights.
Let's just hope he doesn't put his foot through a tile.
--
Bruce | 41.1670S | \ spoken | -+-
Hoult | 174.8263E | /\ here. | ----------O----------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- From: dbohara
- Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- References:
- Shuttle damage overkill
- From: MJP
- Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- From: mcdaniel_san2
- Shuttle damage overkill
- Prev by Date: Re: Helium 3 and the moon
- Next by Date: Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- Previous by thread: Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- Next by thread: Re: Shuttle damage overkill
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|