Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 00:26:15 GMT
"Joann Evans" <bondage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42F427A6.11D91B33@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Pat Flannery wrote:
> >
> > Jeff Findley wrote:
> >
> > >Which is why after a few test flights, the ejection seats were removed
from
> > >Columbia (the first orbiter) and the crew wore crash helmets
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Oh, I hope not...
> >
> > Jose
>
> That's correct. (You might remember a 'negative seats' call when they
> exceeded the safe altitude/speed for their use) You can save only
> pilot/co-pilot that way, and on the first flights, that's all there
> were.
>
> Having that now, would leave anyone else up the creek...
I think you missed the joke Joann. Note who really wrote the reply and then
the "fake" sig.
>
> --
>
> You know what to remove, to reply....
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Alan Anderson
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- References:
- should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Henk Boonsma
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Cardman
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Joann Evans
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- From: Joann Evans
- should space shuttle be cancelled?
- Prev by Date: Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- Next by Date: Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- Previous by thread: Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- Next by thread: Re: should space shuttle be cancelled?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|