Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:01:35 -0600
In article <dn6af1ts2qljpes6kefh6c54f7r4137gjk@xxxxxxx>,
Cardman <do-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Some people keep talking about Mars which would take money away from the
> >Lunar program.
>
> Mars is the main goal here.
According to whom?!? Certainly not in the President's speech, which
mentioned Mars "and other destinations" only in passing. And certainly
not in my view of how space should be developed, either.
> Some people would prefer a more direct
> route, without going to the Moon first.
Which would be a very poor choice, resulting in little or no development
of space.
,------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Joseph J. Strout Check out the Mac Web Directory: |
| joe@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.macwebdir.com |
`------------------------------------------------------------------'
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Cardman
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- References:
- Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Cardman
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Cardman
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Michael Rhino
- Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- From: Cardman
- Improved lunar landing architecture
- Prev by Date: Re: Deep Impact Kicks Off Fourth of July with Deep Space Fireworks
- Next by Date: Re: Around the Moon for $100M!
- Previous by thread: Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- Next by thread: Re: Improved lunar landing architecture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|