Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: "Kim Keller" <kekeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 02:23:52 GMT
"Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123722586.516736.274220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Most strikingly, the letter also says that NASA
> is agreeing to consider phasing out Delta 2 in
> favor of EELV. This means that long-running
> Thor-Delta, probably the world's most reliable
> active launch vehicle - the launcher that has
> boosted all of NASA's recent Mars missions - is
> in danger of being abandoned. The alternative
> launchers cost more than Delta 2, so giving up
> Delta 2 means fewer, costlier missions - unless
> SpaceX succeeds in developing its proposed
> Delta 2 class launcher.
Actually, you'd be surprised what a Delta II costs these days. Delta II
Heavy pushes $100M.
On a totally separate note, Griffin's contention that he can develop the
"Shaft" CEV carrier for $5B stinks. There's no way it would cost that much
to ass-rate an EELV, and i'll bet the mission costs would be lower, too.
More politics at work.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- References:
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Prev by Date: Re: Space Parachutes
- Next by Date: Re: Deja Vu
- Previous by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Next by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading