Re: I take objection to NASA's Mars plans!

Cardman,
It's not that many others and I do not appreciate your verbal stance
against our resident warlord(GW Bush), as being that of a certified
warmonger that he is, it's just that actions mean 1000% more than
whatever words can possibly convey. Your actions of continually
supporting our perpetrated cold-war by way of supporting the
MI5/NSA~NASA/Apollo rusemaster sting of the century, of such a
grandiose fiasco stands as nothing less than the holy grail of truth as
to what you'll do in order to brown-nose your way along. Obviously no
person likes to discover that they've been so thoroughly snookered, not
yourself nor did I appreciate it one damn bit. However, as long as the
regular laws of physics do not apply to our moon, and that of whatever
hard-science provided as evidence proving that we haven't walked on the
moon is continually being excluded by your fun loving mainstream status
quo, as well as for their getting a free ride worth of infomercials as
hyped along by supposedly nice folks like yourself, there's nothing
much other that you could possibly have to say that's any more
meaningful nor insightful than what a Hitler minion would have to offer
in justifying whatever his or her boss had been doing and/or was
planning upon doing that somehow meant that they had nothing whatsoever
to do with their collaboration in such crimes against humanity.

It's apparent that some religions have been exactly like our LLPOF
politics, in that they don't even include any word nor phase of their
making mistakes, just like our mutually perpetrated cold-war and the
demise of JFK was clearly no mistake. Apparently everything happened
exactly as it was supposed to and ended with the same desired outcome
regardless of whatever's the truth. I'll have to suppose if having a
second chance of doing things all over, that yourself and of those you
clearly admire would not have altered one damn thing.

Obviously you're the one that's taking items of a given topic out of
context, then reinterpreting in order to benefit your mindset upon
offering damage-control in order to benefit the task of bucking against
whatever skews your pagan religion, of bucking on behalf of whatever
your born-again lord and master MI5/NSA~NASA has to offer, including
acceptance of all their infomercials and the full monty of whatever
they happen to say as the one and only gospel truth, even though it's
still rather odd how your pagan religion can't put-up nor shut-up
whenever it come down to applying the regular laws of physics and of
their own Kodak worth of photographic hard-science, such as per images
obtained from supposedly their own orbits that simply doesn't come
close to their EVA/moonsuit obtained images. I suppose you never
bothered to actually take a look-see at those PhotoShop doctored
"moonpans" images of depicting such an expansive lunar expanse of
territories of essentially white-out zones, of nearly if not better
than 60% albedo as compared to those 80~85% reflective moonsuits that
weren't ever hardly dusty at all, if they had a little dust it was a
very portland cement dosage of apparently an entirely nonreactive gray
color of pumice like substance to boot.

I believe the most reflective of lunar white-out zones has been well
documented as a relatively good sized crater )possibly still venting
something) that's offering an albedo of 0.25, thus 25% is actually quit
illuminated at 1.4 kw/m2 but, that simply isn't hardly anything like
the vast expanse of what had been supposedly recorded by the highest of
quality camera, lens and film of the day, along with only the benefit
of a polarised filter, which if anything should have made such an
unusually reflective lunar surface as photo-record as somewhat darker
(<50% darker than of secondary and/or recoil illuminated items),
certainly not lighter.

BTW; the natural and average color of the moon (as verified with Earth
in the background) isn't that of cornmeal and portland cement gray,
it's actually a fairly dark hue of a golden reddish like composite of
carbon, iron and titanium dust as mixed in with a good amount of local
basalts that are of the relatively near coal like variation of basalt.
Thus from the views obtained by other satellites (terrestrial as well
as lunar) and by the Apollo orbit obtained archive of images which
confirm upon one another as to the 11~12% albedo and of the extremely
rough and crisp amounts of bedrock, meteorite remains and of the
enormous cosmic morgue of strewn shards of such impacts are in fact
indicating as absolutely nothing at all like any of the images obtained
from those Apollo EVAs. In fact, the best resolution available of the
lunar surface and especially of the specific Apollo landing sites that
would have been impossible for their orbiting CM to have avoided (nor
would they have wanted to avoid photo-recording such) are showing us
that 100 fold better resolution than any of KECK as offering no such
lander site remains of anything less than what has to be classified as
looking as what recent impacts should look like.

The impressive Apollo/CM camera and the optional 10X telephoto if such
efforts were that of a manned orbiting situation, were each offering
terrific 70 mm worth of 50 mm x 50 mm photographic grain resolution of
nearly 8192 x 8192 (164 pixels or lines/mm in B&W, roughly half that in
color at better than 256 bits/pixel or associated group of emulsion
grains), unlike the surface EVA situation, their photographic survey
via orbiting CM efforts that could have been accomplished as entirely
robotic should have been appropriately band-pass filtered and obviously
least impacted by primary as will as secondary/recoil photons, not to
mention avoiding the surface thermal extremes upon plastic film having
to survive being either summarily roasted and/or sub-frozen in the
shade wild avoiding all of the secondary/recoil worth of hard-X-rays to
boot. Christ almighty, think about it, or are you so pathetically
snookered that even the mere notion of thinking has become
taboo/nondisclosure?

Think about the color of star dust, of the sorts of raw elements having
been tossed at 300+ km/s at the moon and, otherwise attracted via
gravity plus the continual happenstance of just having been running
into stuff that's either passing nearby or headed for Earth, which
isn't of a gray pumice composition of a thin and nicely clumping layer
of cornmeal and portland cement like composite. Just the thermal shift
from day to night upon the moon insures that there's a great deal of
depth to that surface dust, and of the terrestrial satellite X-Ray
images of the moon further insures that the reactive nature of the
fully solar illuminated terrain is any but non-reactive.

You don't seem to know an honest squat about Kodak physics and yet, you
seem more than willing to keep excluding whatever evidence rocks your
good ship LOLLIPOP, all because you can't admit as to how thoroughly
snookered you and those you've admired have been taken to the cleaners
by the sorts of all-knowing folks claiming as having "the right stuff".
Apparently the right stuff that suits your life and mindset is exactly
like whatever's covering your brown nose. Until you realize that
there's a possibility of life outside the big-brother box of whatever
our MI5/NSA~NASA has been telling you, there's no great white hope of
whatever else can salvage your infomercial and dog-wagged driven soul.
I wish that I could help, but then I've honestly tried and quite
obviously proven that I'm not sufficiently borg qualified to suit your
intellectually incest cloned borgism of such a pagan three-faced
religion that has so thoroughly assimilated the likes of yourself into
their Skull and Bones hall of fame, in that you've become situated
right nextdoor to our resident warlord(GW Bush) that you claim to not
admire. What's wrong with this picture?

GW Bush hasn't been our one and only SOB of a *** and certified
LLPOF president, he's just the most recent one that has been quivering
his botoxin injected finger over the really big RED-BUTTON of utilizing
his lose thermal nuclear cannons in order to secure the remaining coal,
oil and NG reserves so that folks like yourself can stay sufficiently
cool in the summer and otherwise cozy and warm throughout the winter,
while everyone else gets to be roasted and or frozen solid if not blown
away or flooded by way of massive global-warming induced storms, or of
whatever's left of their economy artificially inflated to the point
that they'd rather be dead. Am I that mistaken in the notion that
there's something terribly wrong with this situation?

Among far too many horrific events that could have and should have been
prevented; How many more Union Carbide orchestrated mass extinctions of
humanity suits your mindset?

Just like the orchestrated opposition to the best and cleanest resource
of energy for humanity is clearly that of solar-stirling/PV and of Wind
turbines that are capable of deriving 20 kw/m2 per footprint, next
being that of what our moon has to offer is asking of supposedly smart
folks like yourself to pitch in with whatever notions, ideas and/or
expertise that'll make good things happen, that'll benefit the lower
99.9% as representing the apparent minions as worthy scum of the Earth,
and improve upon our environment at the same time, instead of insuring
the upper most 0.1% a continuation of their mainstream status quo at
the ongoing demise of all others. It's actually quite simple; Are you
with humanity and the task of salvaging our environment or, are you
exactly like GW Bush as for being against humanity and equally against
our environment?

END RANT
~

In spite of the ongoing orchestrated status quo, it seems there's been
other life upon Venus
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator) as interactive within
the ME-L1/EM-L2 sweet-spot
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Of things Sirius, proto-moons, Venus, Earthly ETs & somewhat testy
topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.