Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2005 06:51:17 -0700
Cardman wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2005 20:00:08 -0700, "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >This launch will have to be approved by President
> >Bush. I suspect we will be hearing a *tiny* bit
> >more about this in the coming months.
>
> Yes, but not that much. Due to past launches the public now sees that
> there is little risk here.
I suspect the "public" who live near the Cape
wouldn't agree with the "little risk" bit. They
remember quite clearly Titan 4A-20, Delta 241,
and Delta 259, all of which blew up within
eye and ear shot of the Cape during the past eight
years.
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Cardman
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- References:
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Cardman
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|