Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Jim Davis <jimdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2005 15:38:11 GMT
Cardman wrote:
> And all used the single RD-180 engine, when
> there is also a two engine option.
You mean all used the one RL-10 (SEC - single engine Centaur)
option instead of the two RL-10 (DEC - double engine Centaur)
option. Atlas V first stages only have provision for 1 RD-180.
Jim Davis
.
- References:
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Cardman
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Cardman
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: People staying in ISS
- Next by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):