Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2005 21:15:30 -0700
stork wrote:
> Yes, we risk maybe a 1000 people
> dying from an accident, but, the gain is the ability to spread
> humanity, over time, to other planets, and manage the risk of human
> extinction because of a catastrophic natural disaster on earth. It's
> worth it.
Which 1,000 people? Your family? Your friends?
You?
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- References:
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by Date: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Previous by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading