Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Aug 2005 11:12:55 -0700
stork wrote:
> I should add too that my feelings are not absolute and are based of
> course on the risk. Given a 1/300 chance of a plutonium release, and a
> 1/50 chance of rocket failure, I assume that the odds of a total
> failure with a plutonium release are roughly 1 in 15,000.
The 1 in 300 odds are the total odds of plutonium
release. They include the chance of launch vehicle
failure *and* the chance that an RTG case will be
compromised during a failure. Now, 1 in 300
are the odds for the entire launch phase, so this
includes failures that would disperse plutonium
into the unoccupied mid-Atlantic, etc.
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- References:
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Next by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|