Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Damon Hill <damonunoseisuno@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:38:54 -0500
"stork" <tbandrow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1124221909.814452.194390
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> Ok. I stand corrected then. At 1-300, then, they should use a better
> vehicle.
>
> I wonder though, what would happen to plutonium if it hit the ocean?
> Wouldn't it combust and form some sort of plutonium oxide?
It's already an oxide; chemical reactivity should be very low.
--Damon
.
- References:
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- From: stork
- Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by Date: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Next by thread: Re: Plutonium on Next Atlas V - Bad Idea?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|