Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: "Jake McGuire" <jamcguir@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Aug 2005 13:24:50 -0700
Ed Kyle wrote:
> Total Delta 7920 Dry Mass: 19,318 kg
- snip -
> Total Delta IV Dry Mass: 28,610 kg
>
> So a Delta IV Light would have about 1.5 times
> more dry mass (about 9.3 tonnes (20,500 lbs)
> more metal, fiberglass, etc.) than a Delta 7920,
> but it would only provide about 1.2 times more
> payload lifting ability. In 1998, Michael
> Griffin said that a launch vehicle's production
> cost is roughly equal to $1,000 per pound of dry
> mass. If true, a Delta IV Light would cost about
> $20.5 million more to build than a Delta 7920.
Ed, if dry mass is the sole determinant of launch vehicle cost, what
explains the 50% increase in per-flight cost that the EELV program is
seeing? Did they add tons of lead ballast to every Atlas V that comes
off the line?
And why do you persist in trying to evaluate higher-order effects using
a model that deliberately ignores them? Do you really consider this to
be a valid reasoning technique?
-jake
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- References:
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Kim Keller
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Prev by Date: Re: Kliper and CEV
- Next by Date: Another Financial Resource
- Previous by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Next by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|