Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 00:51:20 GMT
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 21:43:51 -0000, in a place far, far away,
gherbert@xxxxxxxxx (George William Herbert) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>> Either approach would be many, many
>>billions of dollars cheaper over the life of the
>>programs than keeping duplicate production lines
>>open.
>
>The point of this is not to save money,
>it's to avoid having a standdown of any one
>system take the whole US capability to launch
>large sized military payloads away.
As opposed to a standown of Shuttle-derived systems, which will result
in an inability to get to the moon, and resupply/changeout crew for
any base existing there. I guess that's OK, though.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- References:
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Jake McGuire
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- From: George William Herbert
- Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Prev by Date: Re: I take objection to NASA's Mars plans!
- Next by Date: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Previous by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Next by thread: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Index(es):
Loading