Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- From: "Alex Terrell" <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Aug 2005 15:28:45 -0700
Pat Flannery wrote:
> Alex Terrell wrote:
>
> >
> >So is NASA
> >a. Going to use the HLV to launch crew to the moon?
> >
> >
>
> The NASA drawings of the HLV that came out a couple of weeks ago show it
> with an escape tower and CEV or CVX on it.; I assume for the Moon
> mission- unless they just invented a expendable capable of doing the
> Shuttle's cargo mission with a crew on board.
>
This contradicts what Paris said.
> >b. Use the Stick, and transfer the crew or extra propellant tanks?
> >
> >If (a), then how much use will the Stick have? Is it necessary? It
> >seems the HLV is needed to take a CEV to the moon and back, and for LEO
> >access T-Space seems a much more cost effective option:
> >
> >
>
> I think the Stick is designed to carry the CEV on orbital missions- for
> space station support and orbital construction of whatever they end up
> using for the Mars flight.
>
Seems like a big waste of $5 billion.
Unless of course you believe the Stickis to preserve jobs, prestige and
capability in NASA.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- References:
- CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- From: Pat Flannery
- CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- Prev by Date: Re: Europe to Join Russia in Building Next Space Shuttle
- Next by Date: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Previous by thread: Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- Next by thread: Re: CEV launch - Stick or HLV?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|