Re: I take objection to NASA's Mars plans!

William Mook,
Just for my having to suggest that we haven't walked moonsuit
***-naked upon the moon is obviously bad enough. However, I've got
lots more really neat stuff to share for those that are not continually
focused until death do us part upon their having to defend such pagan
institutions of soft-science and conditional-physics that thrives only
under the ruse/sting of a skewed social/political and too often
religious agenda, of intent and actions that are not anywhere nearly as
rational nor as moral as we'd been lead to believe,yet you in fact do
believe every word as long as it supports your mindset, thus borg like
intellectual mentality of whatever the collective of your peers has to
say is just perfectly fine and dandy by way of your high standards and
accountability that quite frankly sucks.

Since it's nearly impossible for myself and most others to tell any one
spook of a soul from any other within this usenet from hell that
continually sucks, all I can offer is that I'm sorry that my Klingon
dyslexic encryption code is often too much for any of their vast
talents and expertise to handle, and I'd perhaps advise that they don't
even try pushing portions of this truth-code through any of our
super-computers because, my thoughts will likely fry their parallel
CPUs.

BTW; this topic contribution isn't about proper/improper words or even
about whatever math, but since folks are clearly afraid to offer what's
otherwise taboo/nondisclosure or need-to-know is why I have to speak my
mind and offer the best I can when it comes down to various
calculations that are offered as to represent the intent of the given
task at hand, and not whatever absolutes that yourself and others are
solely looking for as a means by which to disqualify whatever I have to
offer. If your math and/or words are so much better, all you have to do
is provide those good numbers and better words, and/or be so kind as to
point out where you've obtained such all-knowing words and math or
whatever observationology worthy images of other interesting patterns
of whatever's either artificial or not about a given planet.

As to all of what I've perceived as the ongoing ***-cheek flatulence
flapping worth of the supposed mainstream intelligence as having been
based upon disinformation and/or evidence exclusion goes; all I can say
is if you've become that brown-nose deep into being entirely
pro-NASA/Apollo by way of their good book, then chances are that your
value as an all-around human simply isn't worth all that much within my
book, and since I'm usually having to work from the back towards the
front, I rather doubt there's going to become any chapter five merger
of minds where the two of us will nullify upon anything except to keep
firing our lose cannons at will (poor Will simply has to keep taking
all the flak from both sides).

Face it; no matters what truths there are to behold, you're probably
forever stuck within your world and I'm stuck within mine, as
incompatable as matter and antimatter. Though at least within my world
of open minds offers somewhat of a free spirit, whereas you're
certainly not about to be going anywhere that's not been officially
moderated and/or fully scripted by those encharge of your body and soul
(as having been enforced by those nifty AKA Men-in-Black).

Basically, of what I'm still saying after six years and counting, as
having been based upon the very same science worth of physics arguments
and notions that I'd started out with but having less expertise as for
communicating such, as well as for our Apollo ruse/sting as having been
further certified along by way of those Kodak moments worth of well
established photographic physics that do not lie, are still the same
reasons that I can say we simply haven't been there nor done that moon
thing, but we really should at least get with establishing the
LSE-CM/ISS before Russia or China gets there's in place first, and as
such it doesn't have to even be all that ISS big of a deal to start off
with, just robotically establishing such high-ground and tether
potential that'll preclude others from taking advantage of this one and
only mutually interactive nullified zone. Secondly, there's been dozens
of perfectly good and scientifically valid reasons for doing Venus, and
a whole lot cheaper and much faster results worth of such reasons as to
be looking as hard as possible at Venus instead of Mars.

More than a decade if not two decades ago I'd learned enough about Mars
to have realized it was extremely interesting and somewhat doable,
though technically representing a lost cause as far as public funding
is concerned. Nearly 6 years ago I learned of enough existing
hard-science and of the regular laws of physics that proves Venus is
that of an entirely new and improving geological situation that so
happens to also indicate as having been hosting a good many items of
potentially artificial structures, that you'd think worth our taking
another look-see. Obviously I was incorrect, whereas apparently
identify all of those WMD from supposedly far better resolution images
was to become our priortity-1.

Thus why otherwise all the flak?
Perhaps it had a little something to do with what had been officially
published and summarily pushed into our supposed higher levels of
education (from preschool on up), and thus having affected the quality
and mindset of life as we know it, as to all of the hocus-pocus science
and physics about our moon that simply wasn't adding up any more so
than the ongoing global energy war that really sucks as being nothing
but further *** loads of LLPOF.

Here's that "harvard.edu" composite worth of Kodak moments, of yet
another one of those gosh darn lunar white-out zones, actually
suggesting of the entire damn moon being of 55+% reflective. That
mountain of apparently moon-snow in the background is clearly more like
65~75+% reflective as based upon the 80~85% reflective moonsuit, and
I'm fairly certain that the color as obtained within this image is
sufficiently corrected as per those artificial items of Apollo being
within frame.
http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~fine/images/desktops/Lunarama.jpg
Of course there's absolutely no sign whatsoever of any stinking LRV
tracks, and as always the pitch black sky that was supposedly over an
extremely dark and nasty (nearly coal like) lunar terrain as having
been observed and nicely photographed from orbit as it should have been
covered in the likes of carbon, titanium and iron dust, yet offering no
dim sign of whatever's worthy of other nearby planets (such as good old
75+% reflective Venus), or of the extremely intense Sirius star system
(as to the unfiltered Kodak eye not human eye) that should have
recorded quite nicely through any polarised filtered lens that should
have actually been making the lunar surface appear even darker, by
nearly 50% less than the 12% albedo, and that's not to even mention
upon the lack of any color/spectrum skew and of secondary/recoil
photons that's entirely missing.

Moonpans offers MOS: Dear Mike Constantine (AKA moonpans),
I see that you've finally gotten around to PhotoShop cranking up the
otherwise subdued (xenon illuminated) blue of the American flag, but lo
and behold, it seem that you still have that nearly entirely 55+%
albedo moonscape that's quite frankly somewhat impossible, and still
nothing whatsoever of the horrifically bright Sirius star system, or
that of any nearby orb of extreme intensely of a 75+% reflective Venus,
that which must have been rather photographic annoying as hell on at
least two of the Apollo missions.
http://moonpans.com/a11neilmesa.htm

I especially enjoy this next official looking page of those autographed
photos that are each depicting as nearly of lunar white-out zones as
having damn few if any meteorite remains nor of secondary impact
shards, then absolutely sharing zilch, nada as in zero worth of
secondary/recoil photons of anything the least bit UV infused as
near-blue, much less as having offered any hard-X-ray dosage as per
otherwise having been since established as a certified hard-scientific
matter of fact by terrestrial satellite instruments, as for the solar
illuminated portions being quite a nasty situation.
http://moonpans.com/signed/

Forget all about the fact that there's still no viable fly-by-rocket
lander (US or Russian);
In no explainable physics way possible would the dark golden brown
(reddish tint of what titanium and iron dust that's got a good amount
of carbon blended in) as color and low albedo of the lunar surface have
been so extensively altered by way of folks being situated upon the
surface, as opposed to orbiting at 100+km off the deck. There are
simply too many direct comparisons of true color and of the raw
intensity or reflective albedo to work with. If anything, the
unfiltered EVA/moonsuit obtained Kodak moments as having been
supposedly obtained upon the surface should have recorded substantial
amounts of secondary/recoil photons, so much so that within shadows and
especially upon the items brought along for the ride should have
provided a noticeable degree of a near-blue cast of secondary
illumination, plus having obtained an overall green~bluish skew which
the film was certainly extremely sensitive to recording of such unless
having been extensively spectrum band-pass filtered in order to have
reasonably corrected for such. Even the initial raw Kodak moments as
obtain from their fully robotic Apollo-8 are certainly giving folks
with half a brain a clue as to the color/spectrum shift and surface
albedo considerations that existed. Later missions from orbit (manned
or robotic applied appropriate filters in order to obtain what's so
perfectly natural about the moon color and albedo that simply doesn't
shift simply because of being situated upon the surface as armed with
only a polarised filter that if anything should have made the lunar
surface darker, and certainly not the least bit lighter nor having
excluded remains of crisp meteorites along with the various spectrums
of natural color to boot.

I ask thar we forget all about the stinking moon, even try really hard
as to forget all about those cloak and dagger MI5/NSA~MI6/NASA
individuals and of such spooks and rusemasters as having "the right
stuff" that so many of us minions seem to think are so freaking
wonderful. I might also suggest that folks should desmirk their silly
faces and if need be botox treat their overly tight ***-cracks the way
our resident warlord(GW Bush) did, and not to forget to wipe off their
extremely brown noses, then just per having to use the regular laws of
physics and of the available hard-science that's been available about
Venus for over a decade, similar to what the likes of John Ackerman and
F.W. Taylor had to work with, whereas then lo and behold and gosh darn
if there's not all sorts of perfectly nifty things about Venus becoming
possible, if not easily surmountable and thus doable, and certainly a
whole lot more humanly obtainable as well as more survivable than Mars
(not that I'm suggesting anyone in their right minds should be planning
upon going to either planet).

Just reconsider upon my observationology with open thoughts regarding
Venus as being exactly what it is, an honest to God subjective
interpretation of what's certainly quite humanly hot and nasty but
also, of what otherwise looks far more likely as for being artificial
than not, thus either as having been constructed by Venusians (possibly
prior to Venus getting itself so hot and nasty upon arriving into our
solar system) or of ETs as having been involved with their needs of
extracting whatever away from Venus. Since it's been more than apparent
that our all-knowing wizard like spooks and their friends can't even
manage to detect upon any of our fairly robust and brightly reflective
Apollo remains as situated upon a nearly coal dark and nasty moon, that
which should have been offering an environment as having been covered
in a deep cosmic morgue worth of crisp meteorites and impact related
shards of dark basalt, all of which surrounded and coated with that
nasty electrostatic composite dust of carbon, iron and the likes of
titanium up to several meters deep in places, thus obviously these
incest cloned borgs and of their MI6/NSA spook friends are not the
least bit qualified as to challenge upon my interpretations of
whatever's on Venus.

Other than my having to deal with MOS from their continued
damage-control efforts, why otherwise are mainstream folks that claim
as being independent thinking souls that yet remain as so closed
minded, so entirely mindset into their being so utterly bigoted upon
self destruction/imploding or bust while remaining focused upon taking
as much resources and of humanity as they can along for the ride of our
lives to hell. I'm sorry to have to say that, as for going to Mars
certainly isn't much better off than hell, as well as hardly being any
cheaper than hell.
~

Life on Venus, Township w/Bridge and ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
"In war there are no rules" - Brad Guth

.