Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Scott Lowther <scottlowther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:12:39 GMT
John Burch wrote:
One reason I have heard for reusing (or at least recovering) Shuttle SSBs is the opportunity for the engineers to see the condition of the boosters after their use and how well, or not, their design has performed.
There is considerable truth in that. And the sorta-converse is also true: one (minor) reason why GEMs aren't recovered, and no effort made to even try to fish one out, is because they *don't* want to see just how ratty the things look. As with the ET foam thing, the less you know, the less you have to explain.
-- "The only thing that galls me about someone burning the American flag is how unoriginal it is. I mean if you're going to pull the Freedom-of-speech card, don't be a hack, come up with something interesting. Fashion Old Glory into a wisecracking puppet and blister the system with a scathing ventriloquism act, or better yet, drape the flag over your head and desecrate it with a large caliber bullet hole." Dennis Miller .
- References:
- Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: The Apprentice
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: The Apprentice
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: John Burch
- Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Prev by Date: Re: Air Force Signs Off on SRB-CEV
- Next by Date: Re: NASA Picks In-Line (Maybe)
- Previous by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Next by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|