Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Default <default@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:37:19 -0500
"John Burch" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:deqf9n$5g6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> One reason I have heard for reusing (or at least recovering) Shuttle
> SSBs is the opportunity for the engineers to see the condition of the
> boosters after their use and how well, or not, their design has
> performed.
I doubt that could possibly have been a real consideration when the Shuttle
was being defined. After all, expendable solids are recovered and
evaluated. Solid cases regardless of reusability tend to survive intact
because of the pressure loads they're designed for.
I'm curious how much they recovered Saturn-V 1st stages and inspected them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Kim Keller
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- References:
- Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: The Apprentice
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: The Apprentice
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: John Burch
- Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Next by Date: Re: NASA Picks In-Line (Maybe)
- Previous by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Next by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Index(es):