Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: gherbert@xxxxxxxxx (George William Herbert)
- Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:48:43 -0000
Scott Lowther <"scottlowtherAT ix DOT netcom DOT com"> wrote:
>George William Herbert wrote:
>>Come on, ATK has spent enough time and dollars on this to
>>give it a name, Scott. Inspire us.
>
>Sorry, inspiration is above my pay grade.
I'm not suggesting you're high up enough to name it.
But you could be encouraging the people with the authority
to do so to name the damn thing. And release the Futron
report, and...
For all I actually know, you are working on those issues.
But if not, please do.
The lack of a real name is just amusement fodder, but the
lack of more detailed data is impeding "the community"
attempting to understand and independently comment on
the potential issues involved. Which generally leads to
people assuming the worst about various issues.
Thanks.
-george william herbert
gherbert@xxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: George William Herbert
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- From: Scott Lowther
- Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Battle for New Orleans!
- Next by Date: So how can we afford that ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Next by thread: Re: Does NASA save money reusing SRB's?
- Index(es):