Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Sep 2005 17:23:06 -0700
Chris Hall wrote:
> SpaceX appears to have leap-frogged the Falcon 5 and gone to the 9 which
> is an EELV class RLV. I know Falcon 1 has yet to fly, but Falcon 9 has a
> customer and the prices do seem cheap compared to any likely SDLV. With
> base model doing 9 tons to LEO for $27M, and heavy sending ~25 tons to
> LEO for $78M (these are pretty comprehensive prices, including range,
> insurance, integration), doesn't this look attractive? That is, if it
> all works.
I don't believe the numbers. The going rate these
days for U.S. launchers is about $10-13K per kg to
LEO. Mr. Musk claims he has a business case for
$3K per kg. I could imagine that it might be
possible for a newbie to march into the space
business with a fresh concept and undercut the
old-line competition, but never by this much. It
just doesn't seem believable to me.
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: New European
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Cardman
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- References:
- Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Chris Hall
- Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Prev by Date: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Next by Date: Re: CNN: U.S. considers plutonium space rockets
- Previous by thread: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Next by thread: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|