Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- From: Scott Lowther <scottlowther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 23:11:37 GMT
Alex Terrell wrote:
1. EELVs can do the job, and they exist. The Stick will simply destroyHow would an expensive Gubmint launcher destroy something like Falcon 1 or Falcon V?
private space launch efforts.
2. The costs are going to be high because it comes with all the SpaceRather less of the baggage, as the orbiter ain;t there. What baggage that comes from having a manned NASA capsule on top woudl coem with *any* vehicle witha manned NASA capsule on top.
Shuttle baggage
3. It's not needed. A Shuttle Derived HLV can launch a CEV, Service
Module, and Lunar Access Module to the moon. And for LEO operation, the
Stick (or even the EELV Heavy derivatives) are overkill. 25-45 tons is
not needed for LEO operation
Not every mission would require Saturn V capability. Using the Heavy to launch crew to the ISS would be a tad excessive.
-- "The only thing that galls me about someone burning the American flag is how unoriginal it is. I mean if you're going to pull the Freedom-of-speech card, don't be a hack, come up with something interesting. Fashion Old Glory into a wisecracking puppet and blister the system with a scathing ventriloquism act, or better yet, drape the flag over your head and desecrate it with a large caliber bullet hole." Dennis Miller .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- References:
- Someone to defend the Stick?
- From: Alex Terrell
- Someone to defend the Stick?
- Prev by Date: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Next by Date: Re: NASA's Next Steps
- Previous by thread: Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- Next by thread: Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|