Re: Someone to defend the Stick?




Scott Lowther wrote:

> >>
> >I think this gets to the heart of the point. Using the Stick to launch
> >crew to the ISS would also be a tad excessive. A capsule to deliver 4
> >crew to ISS could and should weigh less than 10 tons.
> >
> >
> How about all the supplies and new moduels and whatnot? What would
> *they* weigh?
>
Supplies could be delivered by Progress, Arianne, EELV, Falcon 5 or 9,
Zenit. Most of these will be cheaper than a man rated stick.

A new module? Depends. The ultimate would be to use the HLV to deliver
a 100 ton, 10m diameter module.

But with a variety of options able to deliver up to 25 tons, and an HLV
able to deliver 100 tons, I don't see any benefit in spending $5bn to
create something with a capacity of 40 tons.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
    ... A capsule to deliver 4 crew to ISS could and should weigh less than 10 tons. ... stage can insert the ET, SSME's and 130,000 lbs of *stuff* into 220 NM easterly orbit. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
    ... crew to ISS could and should weigh less than 10 tons. ... flights- and that saves money and reduces the risk of a launch mishap by reducing the number of launches. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: What makes an ideal Moon base?
    ... My assumption was that cargo pallets would be delivered, ... 10 tons 300KW. ... Crew 2 plus 7 tons of supplies ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: What makes an ideal Moon base?
    ... My assumption was that cargo pallets would be delivered, ... 10 tons 300KW. ... Crew 2 plus 7 tons of supplies ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: What makes an ideal Moon base?
    ... My assumption was that cargo pallets would be delivered, ... 10 tons 300KW. ... Crew 2 plus 7 tons of supplies ...
    (sci.space.policy)

Quantcast