Re: Back to the Moon
- From: "Brad Guth" <ieisbradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Sep 2005 16:39:39 -0700
Christopher,
Here's another ongoing perspective that's asking us dumfounded minions
as to why space-travel and/or EVA/moonsuit walks are the least bit news
worthy, as with any regard to radiation. Haven't we been there and done
all of that as of 35+years ago, and without a measurable scratch,
perforation nor much greater than a combined rad of TBI dispite the
limited degree of shielding, obtaining zilch worth of any film spectrum
or any other exposure related skew?
Lo and behold, whereas according to our crack MI6/NSA~NASA spooks and
thus supposedly accepted by many village idiots like myself, these days
of vastly superior applied fly-by-rocket technology is supposedly why
we can most easily goto the moon, and then some. Go figure otherwise.
The following is what I've contributed within similar/related topics,
so you don't have to take it personal unless you want to pick another
fight that I'll win in more ways than you can shake another flaming
stick at.
Sorry about this somewhat wordy contribution. However, it seems
entirely logical that Russia or perhaps China (not the good old USofA,
much less MI6/NSA~NASA) is going to mine the moon, that is shortly
after they've established their one and only LSE-CM/ISS and thereby
affectively established the best ever star-wars high ground. Whereas
then they're going to kick serious ***, namely ours. Then it's off to
visit the wizard of ET Oz that has been situated upon Venus, once again
leaving us pathetic brown-nosed minions far behind in their LSE and
whatever moon-dust.
Since so many folks within USENST (perhaps even like yourself) are
seemingly so gosh darn all-knowing and even a bit more than brown-nosed
than myself to boot, perhaps yourself plus most any other incest cloned
wizard/borg friend of the mainstream status quo can best explain as to
why any of this following context as having been contributed by our
NASA is the least bit news worthy.
NASA News Release "Radioactive Moon"
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/08sep_radioactivemoon.htm
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/nasa_sci_radioactive_moon.html
"Summary - (Sep 9, 2005) When humans return to the Moon in the next
decade, they'll be facing a dangerous combination of cosmic rays and
solar flares. Astronauts will need to avoid getting too much radiation,
so NASA is working to better understand risks. The upcoming Lunar
Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) will carefully measure and map the Moon's
radiation environment. It will also have a special instrument designed
to simulate how this radiation will affect the human body."
"The surface of the Moon is baldly exposed to cosmic rays and solar
flares, and some of that radiation is very hard to stop with shielding.
Furthermore, when cosmic rays hit the ground, they produce a dangerous
spray of secondary particles right at your feet. All this radiation
penetrating human flesh can damage DNA, boosting the risk of cancer and
other maladies."
Says Harlan Spence, a professor of astronomy at Boston University;
"We really need to know more about the radiation environment on the
Moon, especially if people will be staying there for more than just a
few days,"
"When galactic cosmic rays collide with particles in the lunar surface,
they trigger little nuclear reactions that release yet more radiation
in the form of neutrons. The lunar surface itself is radioactive!"
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_dangers_040120.html
"The Moon, with no atmosphere, is more dangerous than the surface of
Mars. Lunar forays will have to be brief unless expensive shielded
habitats are built."
Double dose or rather perhaps Double duh
"Particle radiation in space goes right through the human body and can
tear apart strands of DNA, the software of life that resides inside a
cell nucleus. Damaged cells can lose the ability perform normally and
to repair themselves."
"There are two primary forms of hazardous space radiation particles.
(These particles are different from electromagnetic radiation, such as
X-rays, visible light or the ultraviolet (UV) rays that cause skin
cancer.)"
"High-energy particles emitted by the Sun during intense flares are one
type. They move outward at millions of miles an hour and can strike the
Earth-Moon system in a day or two. Earth's magnetic field shields the
planet from most of these. Some get through, though, especially in
intense streams lasting several hours when a storm's magnetic field is
aligned in a certain way with that of the planet's."
"Warning times for Sun storms can be as little as 18 hours."
That's roughly 2400 km/s of whatever's extremely TBI hot and nasty and,
I believe such solar wind has to include quite a bit of picogram
flak/m3 that's traveling at lest half as fast, perhaps delivering as
great as 10 picogram/m3 at 1200 km/s by which the KE worth of that fast
arriving substance can essentially knock yourself onto your moonsuit
***, if not turn your moonsuit into that of a nicely nano perforated
moonsuit that could actually leak O2 and the likes of human sweat and
blood from within, which might actually act as a necessary Perforation
byproduct that'll keep your moonsuit air tight. However, in addition to
the solar primary radiation dosage that should have terminated a good
portion of your DNA, there's also the secondary/recoil aspects as
contributed by the surrounding local dosage that's just as bad off if
not worse. Without a significant atmosphere is what gives such a berth
of hard-X-rays a free ride as to going in all directions and about as
far as the eye can see, such as all the way to Earth where such
radiation has been well documented via terrestrial satellites that are
situated well below the Van Allen expanse as for shielding such
satellites and certainly us from much of the lunar radiation, although
our relatively thick atmosphere is what's primarily saving our DNA/RNA
from becoming exterminated via moon, solar and cosmic radiation, not to
mention keeping the vast bulk of debris from ever touching down.
http://lunar.arc.nasa.gov/results/neures.htm
>>From this old data It looks as though the largest of craters situated
about the lunar South Pole offers a somewhat less reactive zone,
perhaps it's less radioactice because of the direct solar influx having
least impacted that central low terrain and, there is certainly a wee
bit of an atmosphere that's otherwise responsible for a measured degree
of radiation shielding. A bit larger safety zone (besides that of
purely earthshine illuminated terrain) though not quite as deep of a
safety pocket resides about the lunar North Pole.
BTW; when certain solar rays hit the moon, such as continually since
that environment is nearly naked to such solar and cosmic trauma, I
believe this is the primary reason as to why there's always a much
greater amount of secondary/recoil dosage of hard-X-rays to being had.
Lunar nighttime or via earthshine is obviously getting things back to
the dull roar of merely cosmic and local radioactive dosages that are
still downright nasty and as such would require a great deal of
shielding as to moderate those TBI amounts down to perhaps something
less than a rad per day, thus affording 50~60 days worth of a working
timeline before receiving their short term career dosage limit.
Avoiding the solar impacted lunar surface goes without saying, that is
unless you have a rather nasty death wish to fulfill, as otherwise an
EVA/moonsuit hour or so that fully solar illuminated might become your
career red-line limit, although encountering a bad solar influx and you
could be down to a few minutes worth.
Actually, as of the late 1960s, there was no shortage of radiation
knowledge as to the likes of our moon, it was just being continually
sequestered and otherwise encrypted so that certain folks could
continually snooker thy humanity for all it's worth. The laws of
physics haven't change or even been modified since way back in them
good old perpetrated Apollo and cold-war days of our supposedly
accomplishing the task of fly-by-rocket landers and walking upon our
moon. In fact, the dosage recording methods back then are nearly one
and same as of today, and certainly of science instruments for
recording such primary and secondary radiation were also of way more
than sufficient methods as for covering their surrounding spacecraft
and moonsuit applications and, of before and long after those Apollo
missions had obtained loads of sufficient moon radiation information
that has merely been sequestered out of sight and thus out of mind for
decades. Thus other than greatly improved resolution which is nearly
always a good thing, so why otherwise waste time and by way of our
spending hundreds of millions if not actually getting into billions
with having to deploy yet another spendy and time consuming radiation
look-see upon whatever our nasty moon has to offer?
More than a decade ago the LUNAR-A mission was set to go and should
have literally nailed the moon, yet it's still taboo/nondisclosure
sequestered as we speak.
According to many that certainly claim to know far more than myself,
there's been damn little argument that the substance of the moon itself
is several fold more background radioactive than the common soil and
rock of mother Earth. Because the moon has but a slight atmosphere of
mostly argon along with CO2 and perhaps a little xenon and even a
likely radon layer near the surface is why it's another well accepted
physics matter of fact that the likes of sequestered He3 is also there
to behold along with all of the nasty reactive aspects of
secondary/recoil photons of hard-X-rays as having too little density of
an atmosphere (though perhaps a bit more substance than you'd think)
for diverting or otherwise moderating their path of DNA/RNA
destruction. Yet in the end, it seems apparent that we still have no
viable robotic nor manned fly-by-rocket lander that'll accomplish the
to/from task, much less of providing any robotic mining, processing and
substance exporting technology. Meanwhile, there's Russia and China
into an honest race as to either of them establishing the first one and
only LSE-CM/ISS, which thank God doesn't even require any stinking
fly-by-rocket landers. The LSE-CM/ISS along with the primary moon
tethers plus having the tether dipole element that's reaching to within
50,000 km of mother Earth (a bit closer if they'd dare) is just the
best ticket ever that our NASA and of all their perpetrated cold-war
partners in crimes against humanity can't quite seem to behold.
~
Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
War is war, thus "in war there are no rules" - In fact, war has been
the very reason of having to deal with the likes of others that haven't
been playing by whatever rules, such as GW Bush.
.
- References:
- Back to the Moon
- From: Christopher
- Back to the Moon
- Prev by Date: Re: Someone to defend the Stick?
- Next by Date: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Previous by thread: Re: Back to the Moon
- Next by thread: Re: Back to the Moon
- Index(es):