Re: Defending the NASA Proposal

You simply can't defend what sucks and blows intellectual bigotry and
intellectual incest at the same time. You might as well support Hitler,
or Popes going postal upon innocent Cathars or worse being our resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) sticking it to those innocent Muslims, while
mostly black folks are needlessly drowning or otherwise taking more
than their fair share of hits throughout large portions of America.

Obviously I have a few minor problems with NASA accomplishing much of
anything that's involving humans in space, that's not representing yet
another ***-load of cloaks and daggers running us amuck.

You folks need to get real by getting another grip upon reality.
Believe in that our NASA has been nothing but an absolute LLPOF
spermology of a cult, and that's pretty much about all that pro-NASA
retards like yourself need to ever realize.

No matters what your fancy dancy pop-up books and those spendy NOVA
infomercials have had to say, we still do NOT have those fly-by-rocket
landers, not even so much as scaled to suit gravity prototype, nor have
we established a viable and thus safe method of EVA expeditions as
having to survived under the raw solar illumination that's a whole lot
more than just damn toasty. There's no available moonsuit that a
micro-meteorite arriving at 30+km/s can't penetrate and, we certainly
can't manage to pack along enough shield in order to prevent a gauntlet
of hard-X-rays from nailing our DNA/RNA to a fairlywell.

The Russian and Chinese focus is upon establishing their one and only
LSE-CM/ISS, then obviously mining the moon comes next, though even by
earthshine remaining as mostly the task of robotics.

BTW; I'm actually pro-NASA, just not pro-LLPOF MI6/NSA~NASA and, I'm
certainly pro about our moon being suited for robots that do not have
DNA/RNA to die for. Short-term earthshine lunar EVAs are possible for
us humans, but that's about it. Besides, at 5 g/cm2 worth of
surface-tension; how exactly are we planning upon walking about many
portions of our radioactive as well as reactive moon?

UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS A WEE BIT MORE THAN 5 CM WORTH OF DEPTH TO THAT
MOON-DUST. If not, then it's the only bone dry moon within our solar
system that isn't dusty.

Thus I for one "oppose" the notion(s) that we even have a freaking clue
as to what's happening, much less of what happened 35 some odd years
ago.
~

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
War is war, thus "in war there are no rules" - In fact, war has been
the very reason of having to deal with the likes of others that haven't
been playing by whatever rules, such as GW Bush.

.