Re: How to be immune from budget cuts


"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:448665ea.600359030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:06:59 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Ray"
> <vze3gz45@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
> way as to indicate that:
>
>>>>> How about a question like this to the public. Would you
>>>>> rather
>>>>> spend NASA's 16billion dollar budget on a spacecraft that only orbits
>>>>> the
>>>>> earth for another 30 plus years or spend it on on spacecraft that can
>>>>> fly
>>>>to
>>>>> the moon, mars and beyond for the next 30 plus years?
>>>>
>>>>Neither?
>>>
>>> Didn't you know? You're only allowed those two choices, according to
>>> folks like "Ray.".
>
>> That's right.
>
> You're right that it's your position. Your position, however, is
> nonsensical (as are most of your positions).
>
> For those who want to see a NASA acolyte, Ray is a dictionary example.

NASA have put people on the moon, and they will be known thoughout
history for this great achievement. You space capitalists have not done
anything of comparable achievement yet. All you people care about is profit.
Any patriotic American would be proud of NASA's achievements in space, and
would also understand that NASA has made mistakes also. After all, they are
only human.

Ray

Ray


.