Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:39:06 GMT
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:24:23 -0400, in a place far, far away, Josh
Hill <usereplyto@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:
>>>fund nutty can't work projects like the X-33 (one
>>>engineer told me that if NASA was ever forced to do something like
>>>that again he would quit his job),
>>
>>Do you really think that NASA was "forced" to give that contract to
>>Lockmart, or choose their flawed concept?
>
>No, but it seems that the staff at NASA didn't believe in /any/ of the
>SSTO proposals.
They don't now. But that has nothing to do with reducing launch
costs. They don't seem to think that's possible, either. They're in
for a shock in the coming years, as they build their new white
elephants.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- References:
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Ray
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- Prev by Date: Re: NASA formally unveils lunar exploration architecture
- Next by Date: Re: Stick - Saturn IB Reprise?
- Previous by thread: Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- Next by thread: Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|