Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:12:16 GMT
On 27 Sep 2005 12:59:32 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Tom Cuddihy"
<tom.cuddihy@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
>Meanwhile those stuck in the pre-shuttle mindset continuously espouse
>"reusable is cheaper" despite ample evidence to the contrary.
What evidence is there to the contrary, other than the single data
point of Shuttle, which was barely reusable? The ample evidence, for
every other type of transportation, is strongly in the affirmative.
Not to mention the basic logic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Tom Cuddihy
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- References:
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- From: Tom Cuddihy
- Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to be immune from budget cuts
- Next by Date: Re: Lunar Architecture Poll Results
- Previous by thread: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Next by thread: Re: Could Falcon 9 compete with the Stick?
- Index(es):