Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:05:52 -0500
John Schilling wrote:
If you want to do better than "crashes once every fifty flights", the Stick
is *not* the answer. The Stick proudly bases all of its claims to safety
on its legacy from a system that crashes once every fifty flights.
Only one of which was due to a SRB failure, so that's 1 SRB failure in 218 SRB firings, giving us a proven reliability rate in that stage of 99.54%. 218 launchings is a large enough number to be statisticly usable as a indicator of overall reliability, so we are dealing with a very reliable rocket stage here. And:
1.) The failure mode on Challenger occurred slowly enough that a LES could easily have been activated.
2.) The design flaw that led to that particular failure has been fixed.
Besides which, neither Delta IV or Atlas V has the payload capacity that NASA wants for the CEV carrier.
If we went with Atlas V, then we'd have to use solid strap-ons to up the performance, and if a single solid is a bad idea on the Stick, then using multiple solids on Atlas V is also a bad idea.
We've had one semi-succesful flight of Delta IV Heavy, so it's awfully early to start making judgments of its reliability.
As for SpaceX and it's Falcon 9....well, once they've got some Falcon 1 flights under their belt they might by taken more seriously in the EELV market.
Pat .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- References:
- Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Henry Vanderbilt
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: Josh Hill
- Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- From: John Schilling
- Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Prev by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Next by Date: Re: Griffin Calls STS, ISS "Mistakes"
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Next by thread: Re: Space Access Update #112 9/19/05
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading